Global Mobility Benchmark 2026: KPIs, scorecard and checklist to evaluate relocation
- Holistic Relocation
- 6 days ago
- 4 min read
This benchmark summarizes key Global Mobility KPIs, a practical scorecard to evaluate relocation providers, and a readiness checklist for corporate programs across LATAM and Spain.

What this guide includes
Recommended KPIs by dimension: operations, compliance, experience, reporting and costs.
Comparative table: in-house vs outsourced vs hybrid models.
Provider evaluation scorecard ready to use in RFPs.
HR readiness checklist before launching or tendering a program.
Why a Global Mobility benchmark (what changes in 2026)
In 2026, Global Mobility programs face increasing pressure to prove control, consistency and measurable impact. HR, Finance and Legal teams require traceable processes, comparable reporting across countries, and providers that can scale without losing operational quality.
Key trends
Higher demand for reporting and traceability from HR and Finance.
Multi-country standardization to reduce operational friction.
Stricter provider evaluation: SLAs, escalation paths and compliance.
Operating models: in-house vs outsourced vs hybrid
MODEL | WHEN IT FITS | ADVANTAGES | RISKS | WHAT TO REQUEST IN RFP |
In-house | Mature programs, high volume, dedicated internal team | Direct control, internal knowledge, continuity | Team saturation, limited country coverage, dependency on key people | Internal RACI · Response SLAs · Escalation plan |
Outsourced provider | Multi-country needs, speed and standardization | Coverage, processes, reporting, scalability | Limited control without governance, country variability | Status reports · SLAs and escalation · Country coverage & partners |
Hybrid | Internal coordination team + local partners | Balance of control and scale, flexibility, stronger governance | Coordination friction, grey areas | Shared RACI · Reporting cadence · HR–provider interface |
Note: If benchmark figures are not proprietary, they should not be presented as hard metrics.
Recommended KPIs for Global Mobility (actionable catalog)
How to use these KPIs
Select a limited set of core KPIs, measure them consistently and apply them by case stage (kickoff, execution and closure). The goal is early risk detection and better operational decision-making.
DIMENSION | KPI | DEFINITION | FREQUENCY | SOURCE | RED FLAG |
Operations | Time-to-start | Days from kickoff to confirmed plan | Weekly | HR / Vendor | Delays due to missing documentation |
Operations | Case cycle time | Total time until case closure | Monthly | Vendor | Open cases without owner or milestones |
Compliance | Missing docs rate | % of cases with incomplete documentation | Weekly | Vendor / Legal | Recurrent rework |
Compliance | Escalations | Number of formal escalations | Monthly | HR / Vendor | Increase caused by missing SLAs |
Experience | Employee satisfaction | Post-onboarding feedback (single question) | Per case | HR | Drops linked to housing or communication |
Housing | Shortlist turnaround | Time to first housing shortlist | Per case | Vendor | Delays caused by unclear criteria |
Reporting | On-time updates | % of reports delivered on time | Weekly | Vendor | No cadence or incomplete reports |
Costs | Budget variance | Difference between estimated and actual costs | Monthly | HR / Finance | Unexplained deviations |
Relocation provider evaluation scorecard
How to score
Assign weights by category, score each criterion on a 1–5 scale and request concrete evidence before contracting. Prioritize consistency, governance and reporting maturity.
Scorecard table:
CATEGORY | CRITERION | WEIGHT (%) | EVIDENCE TO REQUEST | RFP QUESTION |
Coverage | LATAM + Spain coverage | 15 | Country list and operating model | Detail countries and how multi-country consistency is ensured |
Process | Standardized process | 15 | Process diagram and RACI | Describe the end-to-end process and roles |
Reporting | HR / Mobility reporting | 10 | Sample status report | Share a sample report and reporting cadence |
SLAs | Response times and escalation | 10 | SLA document and escalation path | Specify SLAs and escalation levels |
Compliance | Document and compliance management | 10 | Checklist and control mechanism | How do you prevent rework and missing documentation? |
Experience | Employee experience | 10 | Survey or feedback template | How is employee experience measured and improved? |
Housing | Housing coordination | 10 | Housing shortlist example | What are standard timelines per city? |
Partners | Local partner network | 10 | Partner list and QA criteria | How are partners selected and validated? |
Governance | Governance with HR | 10 | Steering committee cadence | How are decisions coordinated with HR? |
Decision guidelines
Select providers with consistent reporting and clearly defined SLAs.
Prioritize multi-country consistency over isolated local solutions.
Validate evidence (samples) before signing a contract.
Readiness checklist (before launching or tendering)
Checklist for HR / Global Mobility
Policy and scope
Define what the relocation package covers and applicable exceptions.
Confirm approvals from HR, Finance and Legal.
Case data
Confirm destination, city, dates and family composition.
Collect internal role or business requirements, if applicable.
Governance
Assign an HR owner and define update cadence.
Agree on escalation channels and response times.
Reporting
Define status report format and mandatory data fields.
Agree on key case milestones (kickoff, documentation, housing, closure).
Checklist for the provider
The provider must be able to:
Present destination-specific plans with milestones and owners.
Deliver weekly status reports including risks and next steps.
Escalate issues using defined SLAs and escalation levels.
Coordinate housing using clear selection criteria.
Manage documentation and compliance requirements.
Ensure validated local coverage.
Maintain end-to-end case traceability.
Coordinate effectively with HR based on agreed cadence.
Provide cost visibility throughout the case.
Close cases with a final summary report.
If you are preparing an RFP, this scorecard can serve as a solid starting point. Contact us.
Explore services: Immigration · Destination Services
Preguntas frecuentes
Which KPIs should be measured at the start of a Global Mobility program?Time-to-start, missing documentation rate and on-time updates help identify early friction and operational gaps.
How can relocation providers be compared objectively?By using a weighted scorecard and requesting concrete evidence for each evaluation criterion.
What evidence should be requested before selecting a provider?Reporting samples, SLAs, checklists and real country-level examples.
Which operating model works best: in-house, outsourced or hybrid?It depends on program volume, geographic scope and internal team maturity.
How can realistic SLAs be defined?By aligning SLAs with case stages and agreeing on clear escalation paths.
How can consistency across countries be ensured?Through standardized processes, shared reporting and clear governance.














Comments